Worst Web Sites 2009
Ugliest / Worst Business Web Sites of 2009, But You Can Learn Something From Them
Ugliest / Worst Business Web Sites of 2009
Ugliest / Worst Business Web Sites to Navigate in 2009
Ugliest / Worst Web Sites of 2009: Honorary Winners
Ugliest / Worst Over The Top Web Sites of 2009
Ugliest / Worst Non-Profit Web Sites of 2009
Gorgeous Websites From The Late 90's To Inspire You — If You Have No Taste
Worst Web Sites 2008
Worst Web Sites 2007
Worst Web Sites 2006
More Bad Web Design
Daily Sucker
Daily Examples of Bad Web Design
Web Redesign Checklists
Checklist 1
149 Ways to Kill Your Web Site
Checklist 2
82 Ways to Ruin Your Web Site
Miscellaneous
Back to The Worst Web Design Techniques Featured on Web Pages That Suck in 2005
When You Absolutely, Positively Don't Want People to See It

FedEx (117Kb screenshot)
My original comments: If you aren't using ad-blocking software, you don't know what you're missing. Actually, you do know, but you don't appreciate how nice the web is when you don't have to look at all those Flash ads on places like cnet.com.
If you're designing a web site, a few simple mistakes will cause your graphics — and even your text — to not show up in your visitor's browser. On the other hand, it's very easy to remedy the situation.
The solution? Don't use the word "ads" in your graphics, or subdirectories that contain graphics." FedEx's mistake was sticking graphics and Flash files in /images/ascend/ads/.
As of March 8, you still couldn't see certain graphics on the FedEx site.
Reader comments: I'm a designer at a major corporation. I like and agree with 99% of your site. Very much enjoy it.
I would just like to point out the FedEx site you feature as not having visible content because of the ad-blocker software is NOT the fault of "dumb designers." A site this size is governed by "higher" people than designers and the blame should start with Content Strategist and Information Architects who plan out the wireframe of the layout before it ever gets to the designer. Yes, this site is bad, and it's because of BAD CONTENT STRATEGY AND ARCHITECTURE, and probably due to pressures from the Business/Marketing department.
I'm not defending all designers, just say put the blame on this one where it belongs. The designer has not real say on decisions such as this.
Anyway, keep up the great work, and look forward to more.
Vincent's comment on the comment: You're absolutely right about the higher ups probably being responsible and I know this from experience. A lot of sites that appear on WPTS were suggested by employees because the boss fell totally in love with some technique.
Back to The Worst Web Design Techniques Featured on Web Pages That Suck in 2005
