Web Pages That Suck - learn good web design by looking at bad web design

 

Worst Websites of the Year

Worst Websites of the Year: 2012-2005

bad websites are like sinking shipsWorst Websites
of 2012

Worst Websites of 2011

Worst Websites of 2010

Worst Websites of 2009

Worst Websites of 2008

Worst Websites of 2007

Worst Websites of 2006

Worst Websites of 2005


Daily Dose of Bad Design (Daily Sucker)

Current Examples of Bad Web Design Presented Daily (direct link)

Bad Web Design

Overview (direct link)


Good Web Design


Web Design Checklists


Subscriptions

opens in new window
My Google + Page

subscribe to my rss feed
Subscribe to RSS feed

Follow me on Twitter
Follow me on Twitter

Articles


Everything Else

The Daily Sucker - Current examples of bad web design

The Daily Sucker

Sites featured in articles like Worst Websites of 2010 often are redesigned, which explains why some sites mentioned in my articles don't match their current look. The Daily Sucker features current examples of bad web design which haven't been fixed (yet).

If you see a site that you think sucks, email the URL to me. No personal pages (personal pages are supposed to reflect the individual's personality and artistic freedom) or web site designers (it would look like a conflict of interest), or others of their ilk.

If I think there's some merit to your selection, I may post it along with some commentary. If you know of a site that qualifies, let me know.

Something that doesn’t suck about a topic that does.

April 27th, 2010 5:05 am by Vincent Flanders

I hate forms. In fact, if I’m not mistaken, WPTS is a form-free zone. However, they’re insanely important for most sites and here’s “Best Practices in Form Design,” a free, downloadable, 133-page PDF (4.37Mb) from the guy who wrote the book on forms.

Download the PDF

Posted in Not a Daily Sucker, Twitter, Usability, Web Design, You Should Read |


GodHatesFags.com is the future of web design

April 20th, 2010 3:03 am by Vincent Flanders

Today, April 20 — which is Hitler’s birthday — seems like a good time to talk about a disturbing trend in web design.

Read the article

Posted in Daily Sucker, Usability, Web Design |


Not the Daily Sucker – Information Architecture TV: Wireframes

April 8th, 2010 7:07 pm by Vincent Flanders

Not the Daily Sucker – Information Architecture TV: Wireframes

Check out the site. Content doesn’t suck.

Website Wireframe Lecture from Chrissy Kimball on Vimeo.

Posted in Not a Daily Sucker, Usability |


I’m getting better

March 25th, 2010 5:05 am by Vincent Flanders

I’m spending a lot of time working with web page speed. I discovered an interesting factoid: if you throw all your HTML, Javascript, CSS and graphic files in the same directory (and modify your files to account for this), your pages will load 20-30% faster. Of course, I wasn’t a math major.

Nice, neat directory structure Threw everything in one directory
   
2517ms (empty cache) 1864ms (empty cache)
1949ms (primed cache) 1372ms (primed cache)
   
I used Steve Souders Hammerhead for calculations.  

Posted in Not a Daily Sucker, Twitter, Usability |


Southern Crescent Tour – The Daily Sucker for Friday, March 5, 2010

March 5th, 2010 3:03 am by Vincent Flanders

Submitter’s comments: Here’s one that really sucks!

Vincent Flanders’ comments: Yes, but it sucks in such an interesting way. Here’s a screen shot of what the home page looks like to the average visitor. Here’s what I find “amusing:”

  1. The focus is definitely the logo. Even so, what does that buy you? I suspect most people who end up at the site know where they’re going. The web is all about expectations and your job, as a designer, is to meet those expectations. Logos are supposed to be unobtrusively “there” at the top-left of the page.
  2. If you’re using horizontal navigation, it’s supposed to be at the top of the first screen — not down in the middle.
  3. I realize it’s a golfing site, but the golf clubs are not a good idea to use for your navigation.
  4. Fortunately, you can read most of the text — because it’s quite large and has to be large because it’s white on a black background.
  5. The TITLE tag on the home page is “home page,” which isn’t very helpful for search engine optimization purposes. Speaking of SEO, I’m taking an ADHD detour here to mention Google’s own SEO Report Card. The description is at the Webmaster Central Blog. It talks about their failure to meet their own guidelines (which include the TITLE tag) and there’s a 49-page PDF file you should read.
  6. There are pictures at the bottom of the page which seem to be centered, but they clash with the bottom navigation which tries to be centered.
  7. The subpages are too long.

There’s lots more, but this list is a start.

Southern Crescent Tour

Posted in Daily Sucker, Usability, Web Design |


« Previous Entries Next Entries »