Web Pages That Suck - learn good web design by looking at bad web design

 

Worst Websites of the Year

Worst Websites of the Year: 2011-2005

bad websites are like explosionsWorst Websites
of 2011: 63+ Contenders

Worst Websites of 2010

Worst Websites of 2009

Worst Websites of 2008

Worst Websites of 2007

Worst Websites of 2006

Worst Websites of 2005


Daily Dose of Bad Design (Daily Sucker)

Current Examples of Bad Web Design Presented Daily (direct link)

Bad Web Design

Overview (direct link)


Good Web Design


Web Design Checklists


Subscriptions

opens in new window
My Google + Page

subscribe to my rss feed
Subscribe to RSS feed

Follow me on Twitter
Follow me on Twitter

Articles


Everything Else

The Daily Sucker - Current examples of bad web design

The Daily Sucker

Sites featured in articles like Worst Websites of 2010 often are redesigned, which explains why some sites mentioned in my articles don't match their current look. The Daily Sucker features current examples of bad web design which haven't been fixed (yet).

If you see a site that you think sucks, email the URL to me. No personal pages (personal pages are supposed to reflect the individual's personality and artistic freedom) or web site designers (it would look like a conflict of interest), or others of their ilk.

If I think there's some merit to your selection, I may post it along with some commentary. If you know of a site that qualifies, let me know.

Smart Security Solutions – A Not-So-Smart Example of Bad Web Design for Monday, June 7, 2010

June 7th, 2010 2:02 am by Vincent Flanders

Submitter’s comments: I was searching for corporate security vendors and came across these guys. The front page is awful enough just from the misguided background and barcode themes they present.

Add to that a horrible 1995-era text scroll, a PDF file as a primary menu link, a quote builder built in Flash that doesn’t resize in Firefox (doesn’t even work in Chrome), a personal message link to the owner’s PARENTS on the contact page (complete with copies of the parents previous e-mails), badly overemphasized text, references to supposed clients that are not referencing anything more than their names, broken image links, floating links with nothing contained within them, and a dozen other problems I just don’t have time to note. And, yes, crazy as it seems, this is a legitimate company.

Vincent Flanders’ comments: It appears that the copy on the home page was written by someone partially familiar with the English language, but who was intimately familiar with Microsoft FrontPage (may it rest in peace). They’re also not familiar with contrast because 13% of the page’s text lacks it.

The Quote Builder tool has lots of problems in Firefox. The biggest problem is that the tool is so tiny. Seriously. This screen capture shows the Quote Builder as it’s displayed in Google Chrome. Inside of this screen capture is how the whole page appears in Firefox. It’s tiny, tiny, tiny.

I couldn’t find anything about the owner’s parents because I couldn’t find the contact page. I’m assuming there is one, but who knows?

It’s also not a good idea to use “Home” as your TITLE tag. Whatever the Java animation is on the home page, it isn’t working. Darn.

As you might suspect, Google’s concern about page speed won’t hurt this sucky site. Google’s Page Speed gives it an 86, while Yslow is a more realistic 78 and Zoompf gives it what I believe to be a more accurate score of 67.63.

Smart Security Solutions

Posted in Daily Sucker, Usability, Web Design |