Web Pages That Suck - learn good web design by looking at bad web design

 

Worst Websites of the Year

Worst Websites of the Year: 2011-2005

bad websites are like explosionsWorst Websites
of 2011: 63+ Contenders

Worst Websites of 2010

Worst Websites of 2009

Worst Websites of 2008

Worst Websites of 2007

Worst Websites of 2006

Worst Websites of 2005


Daily Dose of Bad Design (Daily Sucker)

Current Examples of Bad Web Design Presented Daily (direct link)

Bad Web Design

Overview (direct link)


Good Web Design


Web Design Checklists


Subscriptions

opens in new window
My Google + Page

subscribe to my rss feed
Subscribe to RSS feed

Follow me on Twitter
Follow me on Twitter

Articles


Everything Else

The Daily Sucker - Current examples of bad web design

The Daily Sucker

Sites featured in articles like Worst Websites of 2010 often are redesigned, which explains why some sites mentioned in my articles don't match their current look. The Daily Sucker features current examples of bad web design which haven't been fixed (yet).

If you see a site that you think sucks, email the URL to me. No personal pages (personal pages are supposed to reflect the individual's personality and artistic freedom) or web site designers (it would look like a conflict of interest), or others of their ilk.

If I think there's some merit to your selection, I may post it along with some commentary. If you know of a site that qualifies, let me know.

The Daily Sucker For Thursday, September 3, 2009

September 3rd, 2009 3:03 am by Vincent Flanders

Everson Museum of Art

Submitter’s comments: As always, you are the best. LOVE the new giant image blast at the top of your site! Here’s my latest nomination. I’m stuck in existential hell!! :)

Sure, the Everson Museum is SO pretty, with the requisite Flash that right-brainers get so excited about. The sucking part is very simple — No Menu Visible unless you happen to mouse over the top of the screen, giving you Mystery Meat Navigation. Grade: F+. You can almost hear them saying:

I'm getting upset

Vincent Flanders’ comments: Like I’ve recently said:

A beautiful looking web site is useless if you can't understand the navigation

Of course, with artsy sites we’re bound to have contrast issues. I checked out the contrast of the home page using AccessColor, and I received the following report:

The W3C recommends a standard of 500 or greater for the color difference and a standard of 125 or greater for color brightness.

Based on these considerations, the results for this page are:

  1. Both color difference and color brightness do not meet the recommended standard for 0% of the total text.
  2. Either color difference or color brightness does not meet the recommended standard for 20.74% of the total the text. A Warning message is displayed next to the HTML source line.

Text on background with images is for 51.63% of the total text.

Yes, I know it’s an art site, but hiding the navigation for a museum is inexcusable.

Everson Museum of Art

Posted in Daily Sucker, Usability, Web Design |