Web Pages That Suck - learn good web design by looking at bad web design

 

Worst Websites of the Year

Worst Websites of the Year: 2011-2005

bad websites are like explosionsWorst Websites
of 2011: 63+ Contenders

Worst Websites of 2010

Worst Websites of 2009

Worst Websites of 2008

Worst Websites of 2007

Worst Websites of 2006

Worst Websites of 2005


Daily Dose of Bad Design (Daily Sucker)

Current Examples of Bad Web Design Presented Daily (direct link)

Bad Web Design

Overview (direct link)


Good Web Design


Web Design Checklists


Subscriptions

opens in new window
My Google + Page

subscribe to my rss feed
Subscribe to RSS feed

Follow me on Twitter
Follow me on Twitter

Articles


Everything Else

The Daily Sucker - Current examples of bad web design

The Daily Sucker

Sites featured in articles like Worst Websites of 2010 often are redesigned, which explains why some sites mentioned in my articles don't match their current look. The Daily Sucker features current examples of bad web design which haven't been fixed (yet).

If you see a site that you think sucks, email the URL to me. No personal pages (personal pages are supposed to reflect the individual's personality and artistic freedom) or web site designers (it would look like a conflict of interest), or others of their ilk.

If I think there's some merit to your selection, I may post it along with some commentary. If you know of a site that qualifies, let me know.

Daily Sucker #2 For Thursday, May 28, 2009

May 28th, 2009 1:01 am by Vincent Flanders

Site: First Bank

Submitter’s comments: I deal with First Bank of Strasburg, Virginia and wonder why they wasted so much valuable landscape at the top of the screen on their “new and improved” site. It’s bad enough on my desktop computer or a normal size laptop, but when I fire up my handy little Acer Aspire One just about everything is below the fold.

I really wonder how many of us dumb old country folks need the included instructions on using the site. I doubt that everyone who uses the site thinks it’s an improvement.

The W3C validator counts 23 errors on the main page. At least I know that none of my students created the site.

I do like the way they used CSS to get the effect of an inline frame without using the iframe tag:

#scrollable {
color: #4D4E53;
padding: 0 10px;
width: 544px;
position: absolute;
top: 350px;
overflow: auto;
height: 320px;
}

… but it still looks like an inline frame and there are two vertical scroll bars on several pages! Usability!!!

If you click on Online Banking Login, you can’t get back to the main pages without knowing how to use the back button to jump back more than one page. Cute.

I don’t know if this qualifies as a Daily Sucker, but I feel better after analyzing the site!

Vincent Flanders’ comments: Hmm. I only got 9 validation errors and 4 warnings when I checked the site using http://www.therespowerinone.com, but when I added index.html, I got the same 23 errors as the submitter found.

I’d like to add that there’s no need to welcome people to your web site. They’ve made the commitment — they are there so you don’t have to try to charm them.

I’ll take your word about the CSS. I don’t like the white text on the red navigation bar. It looks cheap and ugly.

While the site isn’t a car wreck on the Information Highway, it has enough interesting mistakes to qualify as a Daily Sucker.

First Bank

Posted in Daily Sucker, Usability, Web Design |