Web Pages That Suck - learn good web design by looking at bad web design

 

Worst Websites of the Year

Worst Websites of the Year: 2011-2005

bad websites are like explosionsWorst Websites
of 2011: 63+ Contenders

Worst Websites of 2010

Worst Websites of 2009

Worst Websites of 2008

Worst Websites of 2007

Worst Websites of 2006

Worst Websites of 2005


Daily Dose of Bad Design (Daily Sucker)

Current Examples of Bad Web Design Presented Daily (direct link)

Bad Web Design

Overview (direct link)


Good Web Design


Web Design Checklists


Subscriptions

opens in new window
My Google + Page

subscribe to my rss feed
Subscribe to RSS feed

Follow me on Twitter
Follow me on Twitter

Articles


Everything Else

The Daily Sucker - Current examples of bad web design

The Daily Sucker

Sites featured in articles like Worst Websites of 2010 often are redesigned, which explains why some sites mentioned in my articles don't match their current look. The Daily Sucker features current examples of bad web design which haven't been fixed (yet).

If you see a site that you think sucks, email the URL to me. No personal pages (personal pages are supposed to reflect the individual's personality and artistic freedom) or web site designers (it would look like a conflict of interest), or others of their ilk.

If I think there's some merit to your selection, I may post it along with some commentary. If you know of a site that qualifies, let me know.

Daily Sucker for Monday, May 26, 2009

May 26th, 2009 3:03 am by Vincent Flanders

Zen Habits(for those who don’t like to read and just want the link)

Vincent Flanders’ comments: Recently, a well-respected site for the web design community cited a number of sites for their wonderful design. One of these sites intrigued me, but it was a site for a web designer and I don’t critique these types of sites to avoid any appearance of conflict of interest. However…

Web design needs contrast between the text and background

…the image above is a full-size, high-resolution screenshot of some of the text (with most of the customer name redacted).

When I went to the site I was hoping for a religious experience and I was not disappointed. I started speaking in tongues. Unfortunately, the web site made me speak in Tourette tongues. Lack of contrast makes me unhappy and sets me off.

Later in the day, I went to my RSS reader and saw that the Zen Habits blog was running a story called Would You Rather Be Right or Happy? It’s a great title so I clicked the link. As soon as I saw the text, I knew something was wrong — and my regular readers will know what I knew was wrong — the #3 Biggest Mistake in Web Design 1995-2015 — Contrast, Dammit. I went to the AccessColor web site to make sure I was right.

Of course, I was right — and that made me happy! Who says you have to choose between being right and being happy?

This screenshot shows you part of AccessColor’s report. Here are the important parts:

  1. Both color difference and color brightness do not meet the recommended standard for 8.99% of the total text.
  2. Either color difference or color brightness does not meet the recommended standard for 78.77% of the total.

Text on background with images is for 0.03% of the total text.

Zen Habits – Would You Rather Be Right or Happy?

Posted in Daily Sucker, Usability, Web Design |