Web Pages That Suck - learn good web design by looking at bad web design

 

Worst Websites of the Year

Worst Websites of the Year: 2011-2005

bad websites are like explosionsWorst Websites
of 2011: 63+ Contenders

Worst Websites of 2010

Worst Websites of 2009

Worst Websites of 2008

Worst Websites of 2007

Worst Websites of 2006

Worst Websites of 2005


Daily Dose of Bad Design (Daily Sucker)

Current Examples of Bad Web Design Presented Daily (direct link)

Bad Web Design

Overview (direct link)


Good Web Design


Web Design Checklists


Subscriptions

opens in new window
My Google + Page

subscribe to my rss feed
Subscribe to RSS feed

Follow me on Twitter
Follow me on Twitter

Articles


Everything Else

The Daily Sucker - Current examples of bad web design

The Daily Sucker

Sites featured in articles like Worst Websites of 2010 often are redesigned, which explains why some sites mentioned in my articles don't match their current look. The Daily Sucker features current examples of bad web design which haven't been fixed (yet).

If you see a site that you think sucks, email the URL to me. No personal pages (personal pages are supposed to reflect the individual's personality and artistic freedom) or web site designers (it would look like a conflict of interest), or others of their ilk.

If I think there's some merit to your selection, I may post it along with some commentary. If you know of a site that qualifies, let me know.

Daily Sucker #2 for Thursday, April 30, 2009

April 30th, 2009 2:02 am by Vincent Flanders

Submitter’s comments: As a grants administrator, one of my jobs is to find grants for our faculty. This is one of the worst web sites for a foundation that I’ve ever seen. There’s the constant motion over the logo (which is repeated on subsequent pages). This motion distracts the eye so that it’s hard to figure out that you have to click on either “ENGLISH” or the Arabic letters next to it to move to the next page. Which leads you to the Intro page, that also has a back and forth motion page.

After the Intro page, there are two different distracting elements – the row of flowers at the upper left, and a bunch of flowers floating around on the page, both of which are in constant motion. How do you find the pages with the information? Look for the little brown pouffy things in the upper right. Oh. I think those are discolored hydrangeas. For a major corporation, this web site. is just lame.

Vincent Flanders’ comments: Since it appears the site took in its last grant application on December 11, 2008, I agree this site is among the most horrible nonprofits I’ve ever seen.

There is so much that’s obviously wrong, I won’t even discuss it. What I find most amusing is they can’t spell “can’t” (they spell it “cant”) on the home page. That’s one of the reasons why Flash sucks. It’s hard to correct typos.

On the other hand, if this web site were active, it would be The Perfect Web Site. This is one of the most important and least-discussed elements of web design.

The reason is simple. They’re giving away money. Yes, they expect you to “do” something in return for the money, but they’re giving away money. Any site that gives away money has The Perfect Web Site — no matter what the site looks like.

The Kresge Foundation web site is perfect. The Charles and Helen Schwab Foundation web site is perfect and, of course, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s web site is The Perfect Web Site.

Even if the designers at the Gates Foundation flipped out and made their site look horrible (Warning: audio involved), it will still be The Perfect Web Site. Repeat after me, “They’re giving away money.”

On the other hand, you’re not giving away money on your web site — heck, you’re probably asking for money or selling something — so your site can’t suck.

Since it seems to be out of commission, The Ford Conservation and Environmental Grants web site qualifies as the Daily Sucker.

Ford Conservation and Environmental Grants

Posted in Daily Sucker, Usability, Web Design |