Web Pages That Suck - learn good web design by looking at bad web design

 

Worst Websites of the Year

Worst Websites of the Year: 2011-2005

bad websites are like explosionsWorst Websites
of 2011: 63+ Contenders

Worst Websites of 2010

Worst Websites of 2009

Worst Websites of 2008

Worst Websites of 2007

Worst Websites of 2006

Worst Websites of 2005


Daily Dose of Bad Design (Daily Sucker)

Current Examples of Bad Web Design Presented Daily (direct link)

Bad Web Design

Overview (direct link)


Good Web Design


Web Design Checklists


Subscriptions

opens in new window
My Google + Page

subscribe to my rss feed
Subscribe to RSS feed

Follow me on Twitter
Follow me on Twitter

Articles


Everything Else

The Daily Sucker - Current examples of bad web design

The Daily Sucker

Sites featured in articles like Worst Websites of 2010 often are redesigned, which explains why some sites mentioned in my articles don't match their current look. The Daily Sucker features current examples of bad web design which haven't been fixed (yet).

If you see a site that you think sucks, email the URL to me. No personal pages (personal pages are supposed to reflect the individual's personality and artistic freedom) or web site designers (it would look like a conflict of interest), or others of their ilk.

If I think there's some merit to your selection, I may post it along with some commentary. If you know of a site that qualifies, let me know.

Daily Sucker for Monday, February 2, 2009

February 2nd, 2009 1:01 am by Vincent Flanders

Submitter’s comments: So this isn’t really about website design. But not all suck is about design. Sometimes it’s about information.

A search engine has suggested to me that I might be able to buy one of these items from Walmart. But this page responds, “Not available online” and “Not available in stores.”

Well, is it available via ESP?

Why bother listing it? Maybe to drive search engine users to your site just to frustrate and annoy them?

And then there’s the list of “accessories for this item.” Accessories for a wireless phone jack that include an external hard disk, a USB webcam (did I mention that this is a wireless phone jack? Something that you might use with, oh, I don’t know, a phone instead of a computer?). Or “similar items,” which are all 802.11 wireless routers (big hint: Just because something is 2.4 GHz doesn’t mean it’s WiFi).

To be fair, there are pointers to similar products in the “other items people browsed when they browsed this thing” section. But there’s something rude about putting a page up for an item you don’t sell where you don’t give the people who stumble in any hope that it might be available in the future, or from anybody else. See also: The Monty Python “Cheese Shoppe” sketch.

Vincent Flanders’ comments: Actually, the submission is about web design and about the most important aspect of web design — usability. If you don’t think usability is important, read The $300 Million “Continue” Button. It reminds me of my recent experience trying to buy a generator from Sears. I couldn’t order unless I typed “Post Office Box” instead of “PO Box.”

Here’s a screenshot of the Walmart page in case they fix it.

Walmart Dual Jack 2.4GHz Wireless Telephone Jack Connection

Posted in Bad Business Practices, Daily Sucker, Usability, Web Design |