Web Pages That Suck - learn good web design by looking at bad web design

 

Worst Websites of the Year

Worst Websites of the Year: 2011-2005

bad websites are like explosionsWorst Websites
of 2011: 63+ Contenders

Worst Websites of 2010

Worst Websites of 2009

Worst Websites of 2008

Worst Websites of 2007

Worst Websites of 2006

Worst Websites of 2005


Daily Dose of Bad Design (Daily Sucker)

Current Examples of Bad Web Design Presented Daily (direct link)

Bad Web Design

Overview (direct link)


Good Web Design


Web Design Checklists


Subscriptions

opens in new window
My Google + Page

subscribe to my rss feed
Subscribe to RSS feed

Follow me on Twitter
Follow me on Twitter

Articles


Everything Else

The Daily Sucker - Current examples of bad web design

The Daily Sucker

Sites featured in articles like Worst Websites of 2010 often are redesigned, which explains why some sites mentioned in my articles don't match their current look. The Daily Sucker features current examples of bad web design which haven't been fixed (yet).

If you see a site that you think sucks, email the URL to me. No personal pages (personal pages are supposed to reflect the individual's personality and artistic freedom) or web site designers (it would look like a conflict of interest), or others of their ilk.

If I think there's some merit to your selection, I may post it along with some commentary. If you know of a site that qualifies, let me know.

Daily Sucker for Thursday, January 29, 2009

January 29th, 2009 1:01 am by Vincent Flanders

Submitter’s comments: May I present: American Media Professionals.

In my opinion the most glaring piece of suckiness is the spinning “AMP” — really, really annoying.

Click on a link. I chose the wedding link. Just about every line of text on the page is underlined. Are they all links? No. The huge fonts remind me of all the unsolicited right-wing spam that clogs my inbox. They also keyword loaded the bottom of every page.

This guy might do good video work, but his website isn’t very professional and makes me want to look elsewhere.

P.S.: The poor woman in the yellow shirt on the Corporate and Broadcast page looks like her breasts are being smashed by the equipment. (Made you look!)

Vincent Flanders’ comments: I apologize to the submitter for not being able to reproduce his/her email as it was sent. To get the full effect, you need to see the original email.

It is now time for Father Flanders’ Sermon on Sinful Shrinking:

Just because Jesus miraculously turned water into wine doesn’t mean he can miraculously turn your 1.21Mb, 1132- x 1696-pixel image of a bride into a 30Kb image just because you changed the WIDTH= and HEIGHT= attributes to WIDTH=”383″ and HEIGHT=”573.” It doesn’t work like that. Besides, Jesus has much better things to do.

The submenus don’t have the proper links. On the wedding page, there’s no link to the Corporate & Broadcast page. We also have the usual litany of text mistakes: multicolored text, centered text, etc.

BTW…Are there any web sites that don’t suck under the heading of videography services? Maybe we have another YAITS — Yet Another Industry That Sucks.

American Media Professionals

Posted in Daily Sucker, Usability, Web Design |