Web Pages That Suck - learn good web design by looking at bad web design

 

Worst Websites of the Year

Worst Websites of the Year: 2011-2005

bad websites are like explosionsWorst Websites
of 2011: 63+ Contenders

Worst Websites of 2010

Worst Websites of 2009

Worst Websites of 2008

Worst Websites of 2007

Worst Websites of 2006

Worst Websites of 2005


Daily Dose of Bad Design (Daily Sucker)

Current Examples of Bad Web Design Presented Daily (direct link)

Bad Web Design

Overview (direct link)


Good Web Design


Web Design Checklists


Subscriptions

opens in new window
My Google + Page

subscribe to my rss feed
Subscribe to RSS feed

Follow me on Twitter
Follow me on Twitter

Articles


Everything Else

The Daily Sucker - Current examples of bad web design

The Daily Sucker

Sites featured in articles like Worst Websites of 2010 often are redesigned, which explains why some sites mentioned in my articles don't match their current look. The Daily Sucker features current examples of bad web design which haven't been fixed (yet).

If you see a site that you think sucks, email the URL to me. No personal pages (personal pages are supposed to reflect the individual's personality and artistic freedom) or web site designers (it would look like a conflict of interest), or others of their ilk.

If I think there's some merit to your selection, I may post it along with some commentary. If you know of a site that qualifies, let me know.

Daily Sucker #2 for Tuesday, September 30, 2008

September 30th, 2008 2:02 am by Vincent Flanders

Submitter comments: I’m looking for a photo gallery for this architect. Is there one? I don’t know. Maybe down below in all the 100s of buttons, but by the time I get there I’m fed up.

Vincent Flanders’ comments: Normally, architectural web sites make the Daily Sucker because they’re over-the-top like the ones I’ve featured. This one is under-the-floor. It’s too bad because it looks the architect knows what he’s doing. The houses shown aren’t my cup of tea, but I can appreciate the quality and complexity.

On the other hand, the web site sucks. There’s no organization, unless you think shoving everything on the home pagte is the definition of organization. There’s no focal point to the pictures at the bottom (why is the navigation at the bottom?). You don’t know where to look and, frankly, I got dizzy looking at them trying to figure out what they were about

Mountain Homes Architect

Posted in Daily Sucker, Usability, Web Design |