Web Pages That Suck - learn good web design by looking at bad web design

 

Worst Websites of the Year

Worst Websites of the Year: 2011-2005

bad websites are like explosionsWorst Websites
of 2011: 63+ Contenders

Worst Websites of 2010

Worst Websites of 2009

Worst Websites of 2008

Worst Websites of 2007

Worst Websites of 2006

Worst Websites of 2005


Daily Dose of Bad Design (Daily Sucker)

Current Examples of Bad Web Design Presented Daily (direct link)

Bad Web Design

Overview (direct link)


Good Web Design


Web Design Checklists


Subscriptions

opens in new window
My Google + Page

subscribe to my rss feed
Subscribe to RSS feed

Follow me on Twitter
Follow me on Twitter

Articles


Everything Else

The Daily Sucker - Current examples of bad web design

The Daily Sucker

Sites featured in articles like Worst Websites of 2010 often are redesigned, which explains why some sites mentioned in my articles don't match their current look. The Daily Sucker features current examples of bad web design which haven't been fixed (yet).

If you see a site that you think sucks, email the URL to me. No personal pages (personal pages are supposed to reflect the individual's personality and artistic freedom) or web site designers (it would look like a conflict of interest), or others of their ilk.

If I think there's some merit to your selection, I may post it along with some commentary. If you know of a site that qualifies, let me know.

Daily Sucker for Wednesday, July 30, 2008

July 30th, 2008 4:04 am by Vincent Flanders

Submitter comments: Good tools, really sucky web site.

I went to the Estwing tool site to look up warranty information. Since I block Flash I was greeted by “The Estwing Web site requires the FREE Flash player. Please download Flash now.”

Assuming that I had found a sucker I unblocked the site.

Your eyes are drawn to the hammers at the bottom of the page. Not true mystery meat navigation because, for the most part, the users of the site should be counted on to be able to ID the tools. At the very least it’s overly cute navigation and a totally pointless effect for the sake of cool.

Put your cursor over the Products drop down menu. Isn’t that cute, too? I am assuming someone thought the bounce was “hammerish.”

Select a hammer, any hammer. Instead of a picture of a hammer with its characteristics you get another Flash movie. Since you cannot move the hammer around to see it at different angles, this seems unusually pointless even for a Flash site. Note those circles with the + mark in them. You are instructed to mouse over (them) for more information. Navigation instructions are always a sure sign of web design “quality.” You don’t need Flash because there is plenty of space to put text info on the page.

Oh, note the animated flag! Not a gif! An animated Flash flag.

It would not be difficult to make this purely informational site look nice and be useful without using any Flash. Using Flash for everything on this sort of site is complete nonsense.

Vincent Flanders’ comments: I found it difficult to select a hammer. Unless I was really careful and moved my mouse just right, I couldn’t select the hammer I wanted information about. It’s even worse after you get the correct hammer. Try to select another hammer and the chase is on.

I really hate to say this, but the Flash flag doesn’t bother me because it’s promoting “Made in the USA.” What I object to is throwing a flag up just to have a flag. A lot of Midwest industrial company web sites needlessly feature flags. I’ve never heard of an industrial company — or any company that manufactures a real product — that’s unpatriotic. Have you?

Estwing

Posted in Daily Sucker, Usability, Web Design |