Web Pages That Suck - learn good web design by looking at bad web design

 

Worst Websites of the Year

Worst Websites of the Year: 2011-2005

bad websites are like explosionsWorst Websites
of 2011: 63+ Contenders

Worst Websites of 2010

Worst Websites of 2009

Worst Websites of 2008

Worst Websites of 2007

Worst Websites of 2006

Worst Websites of 2005


Daily Dose of Bad Design (Daily Sucker)

Current Examples of Bad Web Design Presented Daily (direct link)

Bad Web Design

Overview (direct link)


Good Web Design


Web Design Checklists


Subscriptions

opens in new window
My Google + Page

subscribe to my rss feed
Subscribe to RSS feed

Follow me on Twitter
Follow me on Twitter

Articles


Everything Else

The Daily Sucker - Current examples of bad web design

The Daily Sucker

Sites featured in articles like Worst Websites of 2010 often are redesigned, which explains why some sites mentioned in my articles don't match their current look. The Daily Sucker features current examples of bad web design which haven't been fixed (yet).

If you see a site that you think sucks, email the URL to me. No personal pages (personal pages are supposed to reflect the individual's personality and artistic freedom) or web site designers (it would look like a conflict of interest), or others of their ilk.

If I think there's some merit to your selection, I may post it along with some commentary. If you know of a site that qualifies, let me know.

Daily Sucker for Thursday, January 31, 2008

January 31st, 2008 12:12 am by Vincent Flanders

Submitter’s comments: Vikki Carr, who is somewhat famous and internationally known, must have the worst web site for a celebrity of her status.

This site is a car wreck on the information highwayVincent Flanders’ CURRENT comments (02-17-08): I went back to look at the site and discovered it has been massively overhauled — and for the better. They also got the site moved to a .com from a .net — which makes the site more easily discovered. The site has improved by about 350%. Congrats.

For those of you who are wondering what the site looked like when I made my original comments, here’s the first 2,180 pixels (out of 16,720) of the home page.

Vincent Flanders’ ORIGINAL comments: Normally, I don’t discuss music sites because their fans will put up with just about anything (Coldplay’s Rush of Blood to the Head web site comes to mind). These sites tend to extravagant use of Flash and/or Mystery Meat Navigation.

Today’s sucker demonstrates the extravagant use of bad 1996 design. However, even 1996 web design isn’t stupid enough to put the navigation scheme halfway down the page. Oh, and the home page weighs in at 3.34Mb.

There are a lot of photos of Vikki with other people. Hint: Put these on a separate page like one of my favorite bands, the Gin Blossoms, did. They have a page called “Gallery” that deals with — guess what? — photos. Yes, yes, yes. I hate the Flash navigation on the Gin Blossoms’ site and the outdated information.

An addendum: Comparing the Gin Blossoms’ with Vikki Carr may be comparing apples with oranges. An apple-to-apple comparison would be Vikki Carr and Patti Page. Patti’s web site needs more contrast between the text and the background, but I think this overall look and feel should be something to aim for in Vikki’s web site.

Vikki Carr

Posted in Daily Sucker, Usability, Web Design |