The Daily Sucker

Current Live Examples of Bad Web Design Techniques

Please read the FAQ -- especially the section, "Why does your site suck?"

Get the RSS Feed   |   E-mail Vincent your sucky sites Read Daily Sucker background first.


The Daily Sucker

Microsoft Sucks — Daily Sucker #2 for Thursday, December 20, 2007

December 19th, 2007 11:11 pm by Vincent Flanders

Vincent Flanders’ comments: I was reading a post on a Microsoft blog about how the yet-unreleased Internet Explorer 8 passed the Web Standards Project’s Acid2 test. Hmm…Microsoft and web standards in the same sentence? One of the ADD thoughts that ran through my brain was, “Hey, go run Microsoft’s home page through AccessColor’s color contrast and brightness test.” The results will have nothing to do with web standards, just the ability to code a page in such a way that the text is readable against the background. It’s all about visual contrast.

I ran Microsoft’s home page through the analyzer and received the following results:

  1. Both color difference and color brightness do not meet the recommended standard for 62.13% of the total text.
    A Fail message is displayed next to the HTML source line.
  2. Either color difference or color brightness does not meet the recommended standard for 0.53% of the total the text.
    A Warning message is displayed next to the HTML source line.

Now, I’ve never met a stupid person who worked for Microsoft (some have been a little too Lifespring-ish for my taste), so I have to ask myself, “Don’t they understand it doesn’t cost millions of dollars to make your page readable?” OK, they’re stupid.

Microsoft’s Home Page

Posted in Daily Sucker, Web Design |