Worst Web Sites 2009
Worst Web Sites of 2009:
Jan.-March Part 1
Worst Web Sites of 2009:
Jan.-March Part 2
Worst Web Sites of 2009:
April-June #1-10
Worst Web Sites of 2009:
April-June #11-20
Worst Web Sites of 2009:
July - October #1-10
Worst Web Sites of 2009:
July - October #11-20
Vote For The Worst Web
Design Of 2009
Group 1
Gorgeous Websites From The Late 90's To Inspire You — If You Have No Taste
Worst Web Sites 2008
Worst Web Sites 2007
Worst Web Sites 2006
More Bad Web Design
Daily Sucker
Daily Examples of Bad Web Design
Does Your Web Site Suck?
Checklist 1
149 Ways to Kill Your Web Site
Checklist 2
82 Ways to Ruin Your Web Site
Miscellaneous
#6 Worst Web Site Navigation — Leo Burnett Canada
Submitter's comments from September 23, 2005: What kind of "Mystery Meat Navigation" is this?
Vincent Flanders' comments on September 23, 2005: Yes, I know that this type of company (advertising) must use this Mystery Meat Navigation (MMN) because they're in the business of looking cool. They realize they need to present an art-fart image to their audience but this technique gets seen by those web designers who design for auto parts stores and doctors. Next thing you know, MMN starts showing up on "normal" commercial sites.
Of course, there's no HTML version of the today's site using cascading stylesheets and Javascript. There's no reason for this design because it's meant to impress the uninformed, but this isn't some third-tier firm — they're important and if you don't know who they are, why are you even visiting the site?
Other comments from 2005: You know, I'm not one who automatically judges a site to be bad just because it's done in Flash. But then I don't automatically assume that HTML sites are crappy, so maybe I'm biased.
Another point about Flash and JavaScript: there is a very important sector that doesn't have Flash and JavaScript enabled, and that's the search engines. Make your site inaccessible to text-only browsers and screen readers, and you make it inaccessible to Google.
Perhaps with this site it doesn't matter quite so much; maybe the intended audience already knows about the company's existence. Undoubtedly the intended audience expects something out-of-the-ordinary, and for some out-of-the-ordinary things, Flash is the most efficient way of doing it. Granted. But will the intended audience be able or willing to navigate the site? We're talking busy executives who probably have as much patience and computer know-how as Dilbert's Pointy-Haired Boss. If the PHB can't work out this site (and the PHB famously can't tell the difference between a laptop and an Etch-a-Sketch — and my experience tells me that's frighteningly close to the truth), it will fail.
Other comments from 2007 #1: This is HORRIFYING.
Still, at least it's fun to jazz it up by writing "wankers" across the screen with the pencil.
Other comments from 2007 #1: These guys are so old and so prestigious and so respected that they don't need Google or Yahoo. They don't need PHBs. It doesn't matter to them what we think.
They're doing advertising campaigns for Fortune 500 companies. They have contracts with governments across the country from small towns to the House of Parliament. They don't even need a web site. They are *that* big.
I don't even know why they bother.
